Better Outcomes through Integrated Collaboration: AISee's Proposed New Study AIms to Close the GAP in Support for Neurodivergent Children

thom Kirkwood • August 21, 2026

Share this article

Long waits. Fragmented pathways. Families and practitioners doing their best with systems that weren't built to move fast. It's a familiar picture for anyone connected to neurodevelopmental   and mental health support for children and young people - and it's the problem the heart of this new research proposal from AISee Collaborative Limited.

Building on a successful pilot, the proposal — Better Outcomes through Integrated Collaboration in Real-World Practice — sets out a five-year, two-stage study designed to test whether earlier, more joined-up assessment can genuinely change outcomes for children, families, and the services that support them.


Where it started

TThe new study builds directly on an earlier pilot, Informed Solutions for Better Outcomes, which ran from April 2021 to September 2022. That pilot used two established tools — the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) — to give families and practitioners earlier, structured insight into a child's needs, well before formal diagnosis was reached.


The results were compelling: 11 partner organisations and 51 participants took part, generating 37 completed reports and 329 identified wellbeing concerns. Most notably, 75% of the actions families and professionals agreed on together were actually implemented — a strong signal that early, shared evidence translates into real change.


That pilot also sparked wider interest — enquiries have since come in from across health, social care, education, employability, and youth justice sectors, along with groups like Scotland's Autistic Informed Community and the Scottish ADHD Coalition, pointing to relevance across roughly 28 service areas.


What's Being Proposed Now

The new proposal scales that learning up into a 24-month "Test for Change" study (Stage One), followed by a 36-month scale-up and implementation phase (Stage Two) — 60 months in total.


The core question: can a structured, multi-informant approach — pulling together evidence from children and young people themselves, parents and carers, teachers, and clinical and non-clinical practitioners — improve identification, intervention planning, and measurable outcomes, while reducing duplication of effort across services?



Participants aged 5–21 would be assessed using a mix of tools, from for example the established SDQ and DAWBA 1995 through to newer non-clinical options like the Daily Living Skills Assessment 2002 and A-TAC 2004 chosen according to each person's starting point and perceived needs.


A Human-Led Role for AI

One of the more forward-looking elements is a dedicated AI-enabled evidence integration workstream. The idea isn't automation for its own sake — it's about giving already-stretched practitioners a hand with the unglamorous but essential work: pulling multi-source evidence together, flagging duplicated or conflicting information, tracking change over time, and summarising for families where appropriate.



Crucially, the proposal draws a firm line: AI would organise, compare, and summarise — but it will not diagnose, determine eligibility, or make autonomous clinical or safeguarding decisions. Every output stays traceable back to its source and reviewable by a human, multidisciplinary team. The workstream itself will be evaluated on accuracy, practitioner time saved, family trust, and cost-effectiveness, feeding directly into the case for scaling up in Stage Two.


Collaborative research team

Built on Ethics and Shared Ownership


The study is designed around research ethics and standards and the Declaration of Helsinki, with informed consent processes adapted to each participant's age and understanding. Children and young people are involved in decisions about their own participation as a default, not an afterthought. A proposed oversight group — chaired by Maria Galli — would bring together partner agencies, clinicians, non-clinical practitioners, and people with lived experience to guide governance and safeguarding throughout.


Why It Matters?


For commissioners and funders, the pitch is straightforward: better, earlier evidence means more targeted support, less escalation, less duplicated professional effort, and a stronger case for how services should be designed and funded going forward. For families and practitioners, it's about a pathway that actually listens to multiple sources of evidence — instead of waiting on a single, often lengthy, diagnostic route.



The proposal is now open for partner organisations, commissioners, and other stakeholders to get involved — with next steps including confirming partnerships, securing ethical approvals, finalising the study protocol, and lining up delivery funding.


In Summary


This post summarises a research proposal submitted by AISee Collaborative Limited. For the full proposal, governance details, and appendices, contact the project lead directly.


C.G. Thom Kirkwood here


Recent Posts

Rights based advocacy: What It Means and How It Protects Disabled and Neurodivergent People
By AISee Collaborative August 19, 2026
Rights based advocacy is about more than speaking up. It is a practical way to help disabled and neurodivergent people access their rights, challenge barriers, and be included in decisions that affect their lives. In the UK, that can mean support with a school meeting, a care review, a workplace adjustment, a complaint, or a benefits or service decision. It can also mean helping someone feel heard when professionals move too fast or use confusing language. At AISee Collaborative, rights based…
Neurodiversity Training for Employers: Practical Workplace Inclusion That Reduces Barriers
By AISee Collaborative August 14, 2026
Neurodiversity training for employers is most effective when it goes beyond awareness and leads to real workplace change. It should help managers, HR teams, and leaders understand how barriers appear in everyday tasks, meetings, recruitment, communication, and performance processes. It should also show what reasonable adjustments look like in practice, so inclusion becomes part of normal working life rather than an afterthought. That is the approach AISee Collaborative brings to rights-based…
Why Is Neurodiversity Important in Education, Work, Health, and Care?
By AISee Collaborative August 13, 2026
Why is autism, ADHD and neurodiversity important? Because it changes how we understand people, not just how we support them. Neurodiversity recognises that brains, learning styles, communication needs, and processing patterns vary naturally across the population. That matters in schools, workplaces, health services, and social care because exclusion often starts when systems expect one “right” way to think or behave. A more inclusive approach reduces harm, improves access, and supports better…
Co-production Neurodiversity: How to Design Better Services With People, Not For Them
By AISee Collaborative August 12, 2026
Inclusive neurodivergent Co-production is a practical way to build services that work in real life. It means neurodivergent people help shape decisions, language, access, and delivery from the outset, rather than being asked for feedback after the main choices are already made. That difference matters in public-sector settings, where a service can look inclusive on paper but still fail in practice. For AISee Collaborative, co-production connects directly to advocacy, assessment of need…
Education Advocacy for Neurodivergent Learners and Families
By AISee Collaborative August 11, 2026
Education advocacy neurodiversity is about making sure learners are understood, heard, and supported in real school settings. For many families, the challenge is not just getting a meeting. It is getting the right information, the right people at the table, and a plan that actually works after everyone leaves the room. That is where structured advocacy matters. It helps with school communication, support planning, exclusion risk, attendance concerns, and the practical steps that turn concern…
Why Neurodivergent-Led Advocacy Matters
By AISee Collaborative August 5, 2026
Neurodivergent led advocacy is advocacy shaped by lived experience, not just theory. That matters because people do not only need information; they need support that understands how systems feel from the inside. When advocacy is led by neurodivergent people, it is more likely to respect communication differences, sensory needs, executive functioning barriers, and the reality of power imbalance. It can also reduce the risk of being misunderstood, dismissed, or pushed into one-size-fits-all…
Reasonable Adjustments Support for Education, Work, Health, and Care
By AISee Collaborative August 4, 2026
Reasonable adjustments support helps people move from uncertainty to action. If you know a barrier exists, but you are not sure what change is needed, this service-led approach can help identify the issue, shape the request, and turn it into something practical. At AISee Collaborative, reasonable adjustments support is person-centred, rights-based, and focused on outcomes that work in real settings. That may mean help for an individual, a family, a school, an employer, or a health or…
Reasonable Adjustments Meaning: What They Are and How to Ask for Support
By AISee Collaborative August 2, 2026
If you are searching for reasonable adjustments, you probably want a plain-English answer, not legal jargon. In simple terms, reasonable adjustments are changes that help remove barriers caused by disability, neurodivergence, or a health condition. They can be small, practical, and highly effective. For example, that might mean a quieter appointment room, clear written instructions, more time, or a different way to communicate. The point is not to give someone special treatment. The point is…
Neurodiversity Training for Employees: Building Safer, More Inclusive Workplaces
By AISee Collaborative July 30, 2026
Neurodiversity training for employees is not just about awareness. It is about giving teams the language, confidence, and practical habits they need to work well with difference. When organisations understand neurodiversity, they are better placed to reduce misunderstandings, support wellbeing, and make adjustments before small issues become complaints or formal disputes. For employers, the value is clear. Neurodiversity training for employees can improve communication, clarify expectations…
Daily living skills assessment checklist on a desk
July 29, 2026
Discover how the AISee Daily Living Skills Assessment identifies practical assets and needs across 68 categories to support neurodivergent individuals and families.
Show More