Benefits of a Development and Wellbeing Assessments for individuals and professionals with the Youth Justice System (2026)

May 27, 2026

Share this article

According to Dis Life: '85% of prison inmates are neurodivergent - but does anybody care?' - The Mirror., many of whom came through the youth justice system.


A development and wellbeing assessment is a comprehensive evaluation designed to identify the neurodevelopmental, cognitive, and emotional needs of a young person. Within the youth justice system, these assessments provide essential data to ensure interventions are rehabilitative, legally sound, and tailored to the individual’s unique profile.  Could this be supportive of Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland ‘Multi-system solutions for meeting the needs of autistic people and people with ADHD in Scotland’ R.C. Psych. 2025 ?

Why is a development and wellbeing assessment crucial in youth justice?

In the complex landscape of the youth justice system, understanding the 'why' behind a young person's behavior is as important as the 'what.' Many individuals entering the justice system present with complex histories, often including undiagnosed neurodivergent conditions or trauma. Without a formal development and wellbeing assessment, these underlying factors remain invisible, leading to a cycle of misunderstanding and ineffective intervention.

By prioritizing these assessments, practitioners move away from a one-size-fits-all approach. For a social worker or a youth justice officer, the assessment acts as a roadmap. It clarifies whether a young person is failing to comply with an order because of defiance or because they lack the executive functioning skills to manage their schedule. It determines if a 'lack of remorse' in an interview is actually a symptom of a communication disorder rather than a character flaw. This shift in perspective is the foundation of Identifying the true barriers to progress.

Furthermore, these assessments are vital for preventing the 'revolving door' of the justice system. When a young person's developmental needs are met with appropriate support, the likelihood of reoffending decreases significantly. We are not just assessing for the sake of documentation; we are assessing to transform lives. The insights gained allow for the creation of robust, evidence-based management plans that address root causes rather than just symptoms, ensuring that every interaction within the justice system is an opportunity for positive change.

Professional youth justice consultation

Understanding the link between neurodiversity and youth outcomes

Statistical data consistently indicates that neurodivergent individuals—those with ADHD, Autism, Dyslexia, or Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD)—are significantly overrepresented in the youth justice system. For many of these young people, their journey into the system began with unsupported needs in educational or social settings. When these needs are not recognized early, the individual often faces a lifetime of systemic barriers.

AISee Collaborative Limited is neurodivergent-led, meaning we understand that neurodiversity is not a deficit but a different way of processing the world. However, when the world (and specifically the justice system) is not designed for that processing style, 'friction' occurs. This friction often manifests as behavioral issues or legal trouble. A development and wellbeing assessment serves as the bridge between the individual's internal experience and the external requirements of the law.

By focusing on Educating the stakeholders involved—police, solicitors, and educators—we can begin to change the narrative. Understanding neurodiversity allows these professionals to adjust their communication styles, interrogation techniques, and sentencing recommendations. It moves the conversation from 'what is wrong with this child?' to 'what does this young person need to succeed?' This paradigm shift is essential for creating a justice system that is truly equitable and restorative.

How does an assessment improve legal outcomes for solicitors and sheriffs?

For legal professionals, evidence is the currency of the courtroom. A development and wellbeing assessment provides a high-quality, objective evidence base that can be used by solicitors to advocate more effectively for their clients. In Scotland, where the focus is increasingly on a 'whole system approach' and the 'Kilbrandon principles,' understanding the developmental maturity of a young person is legally significant.

When a solicitor presents an assessment to a sheriff or magistrate, they are providing a clear context for the individual’s actions. This information can influence:

  • Fitness to Plead: Determining if the young person actually understands the charges and the legal process.
  • Culpability: Assessing how much the young person’s neurodevelopmental profile impacted their decision-making at the time of the offense.
  • Sentencing Options: Steering the court toward community-based, therapeutic interventions rather than custodial sentences that might exacerbate existing issues.
  • Communication Adjustments: Informing the court on how to speak to the young person so they can meaningfully participate in their own defense.

By Empowering legal experts with this data, we ensure that justice is not blind to the realities of neurodevelopment. A sheriff who understands that a defendant has significant cognitive processing delays will be more likely to approve a tailored supervision order that includes specialist support, rather than a standard order that the young person is likely to breach due to their disability.

Facilitating informed solutions for social workers and educators

Social workers and educators are often the frontline of support, yet they are frequently stretched thin with generic resources. A development and wellbeing assessment provides the specific, granular detail needed for Solutionising complex cases. Instead of guessing which intervention might work, these professionals can align their strategies with the young person's actual cognitive profile.

For an educator, knowing that a student has a specific sensory processing disorder can lead to immediate, low-cost changes in the learning environment that prevent 'meltdowns' which might otherwise lead to police involvement. For a social worker, understanding a young person's attachment history in conjunction with their neurodivergence allows for a more nuanced risk assessment. It moves the practice away from reactive crisis management and toward proactive, preventative care.

Collaboration is at the heart of our mission. By Collaborating across sectors, we ensure that the findings of an assessment don't just sit in a file. We work to ensure that the educator knows what the social worker knows, and both understand the recommendations of the developmental expert. This unified approach creates a safety net of informed adults who are all pulling in the same direction, significantly improving the stability and wellbeing of the young person.

Legal and social work professionals collaborating

What specific areas does a comprehensive assessment cover?

To be truly effective, an assessment must look at the 'whole person.' It is not enough to simply provide a diagnosis; we must understand how different factors interact to influence the young person's daily life and legal standing. A standard high-quality development and wellbeing assessment typically includes the following domains:

  • Cognitive Profile: Assessing IQ, memory, and processing speed to understand learning capabilities.
  • Executive Functioning: Evaluating the ability to plan, organize, and control impulses.
  • Communication Skills: Checking both expressive and receptive language to ensure they understand legal instructions.
  • Emotional Regulation: Identifying how the young person manages stress, anger, and anxiety.
  • Neurodevelopmental History: Screening for ADHD, Autism, FASD, and other conditions that impact behavior.

These components provide a 360-degree view of the individual, ensuring no stone is left unturned in the pursuit of better outcomes.

Summary of benefits and next steps

A development and wellbeing assessment is an indispensable tool for anyone working within the youth justice system. It provides the clarity needed to navigate complex neurodevelopmental issues, ensures legal proceedings are fair and informed, and empowers practitioners to deliver truly effective support. By identifying hidden barriers and solutionising with evidence, we can significantly lower the barriers for neurodivergent individuals and foster a more just society.

Core Takeaways for Professionals:

  • Informed Advocacy: Solicitors can use assessments to provide crucial context in court and influence sentencing.
  • Targeted Support: Social workers and educators can move from generic care to specific, profile-led interventions.
  • Reduced Recidivism: Addressing root developmental causes leads to more sustainable long-term outcomes for young people.
  • Systemic Equity: Promoting a deeper understanding of neurodiversity within the legal and educational frameworks.

If you are a professional seeking to improve outcomes for a young person, consider Talking to an Advocate or exploring our Advocating services to see how a formal assessment can benefit your current case load.


One can if one wishes explore a project within our Test for Change project space.


Thom Kirkwood PhD. FITOL. FIntAPA. MIEP. GA.

Director/Advocating Inclusion Specialist

AISee Collaborative Limited


Global Interlocutor

International Advocacy Practitioners Association

Recent Posts

By thom Kirkwood June 9, 2026
This book was recommended for inclusion in AISee’s inspirational and reflective reading list by an international colleague. For me, it proved to be more reflective than inspirational. It invited me to pause and think not only about how our understanding has developed over time, but also how much remains uncertain, unspoken and still to be learnt. It first led me to reflect on how long the journey of learning, research, and understanding can be. The first recorded use of the word autism is generally attributed to the Swiss psychiatrist Paul Eugen Bleuler around 1911. It appeared again in the work of the Russian psychiatrist Grunya Sukhareva in the early 1920s, culminating in one of the first clinical descriptions of autistic traits in 1925. That was some twenty-five years before the work of Kanner and Asperger, a reminder of how gradual, layered, and often incomplete progress in this field has been.
An individualised holistic assessment planning layout
May 30, 2026
Learn how to create effective, in-school individualised holistic assessments for neurodivergent students with our comprehensive 2026 guide for teachers and parents.
May 1, 2026
Peer Advocacy training empowers individuals with lived experience to support others within their community. AISee Collaborative provides Institute of Training and Occupational Learning, ITOL-accredited training programs that bridge the gap between service users' local authorities and more, ensuring informed, neurodivergent-led solutions that improve outcomes across Scotland’s service provisions and local and national policy and practice frameworks in 2026. A project in partnership with South Lanarkshire's Autism Resource Coordination Hub and MOSAIC, Members of Scotland's Autism Community.
By thom Kirkwood March 30, 2026
An exceptional informative resource from our Inspirational and Reflective Reading List. This book received numerous suggestions for inclusion from frontline grass roots practitioners as well as parents and carers. As a parent carer and advocacy practitioner, I personally got intrigued. Written by clinicians and teachers with decades of experience working with kids, these unique and effective therapy tools are vital to enhancing children and young people’s skills how to cope with and overcome their day-to-day challenges. Step-by-step, you'll see how the best strategies from cognitive behavioural therapy are adapted for children to treat and help Trauma ADHD Autism Anxiety
By thom Kirkwood March 30, 2026
I hear you ask, what is he talking about this time? I had the privilege a couple of weeks ago of attending one of IntAPA’s DiACs. An IntAPA take on the work of AISee Collaborative, DiAC - Drop in Advocacy Café’s. This was a great global discussion with fellow members. These members included advocacy practitioners and other members who have an advocating component to their main day job, teachers, allied health professionals, social workers and more. What came to the fore very quickly was the global regression and practice of avoidance as opposed to more meaningful inclusion within education, occupational opportunities, for the communities of autism, ADHD and learning disabilities. Personally, I admit, I was a bit taken aback by this. Especially given from Listening Globally, Thinking Nationally, Acting Locally, LGTNAL, from across 36 countries, it was collectively identified the 17 systemic challenges, a global first faced by this community, and there have been significant strides or so the rhetoric would have us believe in addressing them. Interestingly for me, I took the opportunity, from a Scottish context, and brought up two recent pieces, excellent pieces of Scottish legislation into the discussion namely