38bace1a

Autism, ADHD and Neurodiversity in Justice: Benefits of Indicative Profiling

Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:48:50 GMT

Indicative profiling for Autism and ADHD in the justice system refers to using evidence-based screening tools to identify neurodivergent traits early. This proactive approach facilitates tailored support, prevents the escalation of behavioral issues into criminal matters, and ensures rehabilitation strategies are accessible and effective for neurodivergent individuals within the legal system.

What is indicative profiling for Autism and ADHD?

Indicative profiling is a preliminary assessment method used to identify the likelihood that an individual has a neurodivergent profile, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) or Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Unlike a formal clinical diagnosis, which can take years to obtain due to long waiting lists, indicative profiling provides immediate, actionable data. It uses standardized screening tools to highlight specific strengths, challenges, and support needs. A practice that could be dovetailed within current systems, gathering via a range of tools, coloration of evidence from various sources, supporting informed solutions for better outcome.

In the context of the justice system, indicative profiling acts as a 'red flag' system. It alerts practitioners—ranging from police officers to social workers—that an individual may process information differently, struggle with social communication, or have executive functioning difficulties. This information is vital for ensuring that the individual is treated fairly and that their rights are protected from the moment of first contact.

Key components of indicative profiling include:

Screening for sensory processing sensitivities.
Identifying communication and language barriers.
Assessing executive functioning and impulse control.
Evaluating social interaction styles.
Documenting historical behavioral patterns.

By focusing on the individual's functional profile rather than just a diagnostic label, indicative profiling allows for immediate adjustments in how authority figures interact with the person. This might include using clearer language, providing a quiet environment for interviews, or allowing extra time for processing questions, all relevant in posing an additional question - Is there a need for an appropriate adult, other professional to be involved in the whole process to ensure rights and communications are fully supported?

How does neurodiversity affect justice system outcomes?

Neurodivergent individuals, particularly those with Autism and ADHD, are significantly overrepresented in the justice system. Often, this is not due to a predisposition toward criminality, but rather a failure of the system to recognize and accommodate neurodivergent traits. When a person's neurological differences are misunderstood, their behavior can be misinterpreted as non-compliance, aggression, or lack of remorse.

For example, an autistic person experiencing sensory overload during a police stop might engage in 'stimming' (repetitive movements) or fail to make eye contact, both can often be normal for some on the spectrum. A law enforcement officer untrained in neurodiversity might view this as suspicious or evasive behaviour, leading to an unnecessary escalation. Similarly, an individual with ADHD might struggle with impulsivity or fail to understand the long-term consequences of their actions, leading them into legal trouble that could have been avoided with earlier intervention. A sister organisation of AISee have developed a proposal for Health Responder App, a tool which would be of exceptional value to many.

Common challenges faced by neurodivergent people in the justice system include:

Misinterpretation of body language and tone.
Difficulty navigating complex legal terminology.
Vulnerability to 'compliance' or giving false confessions under pressure.
Overwhelming sensory environments in police stations and courts.
Inadequate support during the transition back into the community.

Without Identifying these traits early, the justice system risks criminalizing disability. This not only harms the individual but also fails the community by not addressing the underlying causes of the behavior. Indicative profiling serves as the first step toward changing these outcomes by providing the context necessary for informed decision-making.

The Role of Early Assessment Tools

To move toward a more equitable system, the adoption of earlier indicative assessment tools is essential. Tools like for example the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA) can be used to gather comprehensive data from multiple sources, including parents, teachers, and the individuals themselves. You can view an Anonymised Sample DAWBA Report to see the depth of information these tools provide.

These tools are designed to be accessible and can be administered by trained raters/professionals who are not necessarily specialist clinicians, but it is beneficial that the this process is dovetailed into a clinical assessment pathway. This lowers the barrier to obtaining vital information. When used early—ideally before a young person even enters the justice system—these assessments can trigger the provision of support in schools and at home, potentially redirecting a life path away from the legal system.

Effective assessment tools should focus on:

Functional impacts on daily life.
Cognitive and emotional regulation profiles.
Developmental history and milestones.
Environmental triggers for distress.
Strengths that can be leveraged for rehabilitation.

By integrating these tools into social work, education, and youth services, we can create a safety net that catches neurodivergent individuals before they reach a crisis point. At AISee Collaborative, we focus on Solutionising these systemic gaps by advocating for the widespread use of these types of tools, including for example AISee's daily living skills assessment, soon to be a Functional Skills and Coping assessment, the use of A-TAC, the SDQ/DAWBAtools. This is not about labelling for the sake of it; it is about providing the data needed for Informed Solutions for Better Outcomes .

Can early screening prevent justice system involvement?

Prevention is the most effective way to improve outcomes for neurodivergent individuals. Early screening allows for the implementation of 'Pre-Justice' interventions. When parents, teachers, and youth leaders understand a child’s profile, they can adapt their environment to reduce the likelihood of 'meltdowns' or impulsive actions that might lead to police involvement.

For many young people, contact with the justice system is the result of unmet needs. An undiagnosed ADHD student may be excluded from school due to disruptive behavior, leading to a lack of supervision and increased vulnerability to criminal exploitation. If that student had been identified through indicative profiling, the school could have provided ADHD-specific support, keeping them engaged in education and away from the streets.

Prevention through profiling involves:

Early identification in primary and secondary education.
Training for youth leaders and social workers.
Support for parents to manage neurodivergent behaviors at home.
Diversion programs that prioritize support over punishment.
Collaborative data sharing between health and justice sectors.

When we invest in identification, corelation of evidential data, we invest in prevention. It is far more cost-effective and humane to support a neurodivergent child in school than it is to process them through the children’s hearing system or the courts later in life. Our Submissions to Policy and Parliament consistently highlight the need for this shift in focus from reactive to proactive care.

Benefits of Indicative Profiling for Rehabilitation

For those who are already within the justice system, indicative profiling is a game-changer for rehabilitation. Standard rehabilitation programs often rely heavily on group therapy, verbal communication, and strict adherence to schedules—areas where many neurodivergent people naturally struggle. Without adjustments, these individuals are often set up to fail, leading to high rates of recidivism.

With an indicative profile, a probation officer or a prison educator can tailor their approach. If the profile shows high levels of social anxiety or difficulty processing verbal instructions, rehabilitation can be moved to one-on-one sessions or provided with visual aids. This makes the intervention accessible, increasing the chances of a successful transition back into society.

Rehabilitation benefits include:

Personalized community service plans.
Specific mental health and neuro-informed therapies.
Better engagement with educational opportunities in prison.
Reduced conflict within custodial settings.
Clearer communication between the individual and their support team.

By Empowering individuals with an understanding of their own brain, we give them the tools they need to manage their challenges. Rehabilitation should be about growth and skill-building, which is only possible when the underlying neurobiology of the person is understood and respected.

Who benefits from neurodiversity-informed justice?

A neurodiversity-informed justice system doesn't just benefit the individual; it benefits every stakeholder involved. When the system works better for neurodivergent people, it generally becomes more efficient and fairer for everyone.

Law Enforcement: Officers feel more confident and competent when they have the tools and training to recognize neurodivergence, leading to safer interactions and more accurate investigations.
The Judiciary: Judges and magistrates can make more informed sentencing decisions that prioritize effective rehabilitation over ineffective incarceration.
Families and Carers: Families feel supported and heard, rather than blamed, when their loved one’s neurodivergence is recognized as a factor in their behavior.
Social Workers and Educationalists: These professionals can use profiling data to advocate for the right resources and placements for their clients.
The Public: A system that successfully rehabilitates rather than just punishes reduces crime rates and increases public safety.

Through Advocating for these changes, we aim to build a system where the unique needs of every individual are considered. This collective benefit is the cornerstone of our mission at AISee Collaborative.

Implementing Change with AISee Collaborative

At AISee Collaborative Limited, we believe that the meeting of minds is the key to lowering barriers. As a neurodivergent-led organization, we bring lived experience and professional expertise to the table. We stand for Advocating, Identifying, Solutionising, Educating, and Empowering with Collaboration.

Given the current available data that we hav e been able access:

Currently 65,000 waiting in Scotland (42,000 are children, 23000 adults) ADHD and autism waiting lists hit crisis point as psychiatrists demand urgent national plan

97% of over 60-year-old autistic females, 95% ADHD and 85% of all autistic people undiagnosed Around 90% of middle-aged and older autistic adults are undiagnosed in the UK, new review finds | King's College London

4-9 times more likely to die by suicide https://www.autistica.org.uk/downloads/files/Personal-tragedies-public-crisis-ONLINE.pd

Over 70% of neurodivergent people have co-occurring mental health issues & Over 80% of people in neurodivergent people are NEETs https://www.gov.scot/publications/microsegmentation-autism-spectrum/

80%+ prison population in England and Wales https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/dis-life-neurodiverse-people-failed-30770620

Cross over representation of neurodivergent care experienced children and young people (five times the rate for neurotypical children) Neurodiversity 101: Why we need to care more for the children in care!

Youth Justice -

Justice for children with SEND & neurodivergence: A review into the current system’s failings Neurodiversity – a whole-child approach for youth justice

Intersecting issued of race, poverty and other ACEs over representation of children young people and adults within poor and ethnic minority communities. & 90% of neurodivergent women with LD have experienced sexual abuse. Unheard-Unequal-Unjust–-But-not-Hidden.pdf (scld.org.uk)

80% children and young people who have been cautioned and sentenced in England Wales YJS have ASN or are neurodivergent. Justice for children with SEND & neurodivergence: A review into the current system’s failings

Surely, the default is 'Now is time for change'

Implementing change requires a multi-agency approach. It means the police, the courts, and the health service working together to share information, as far as possible always with individual and or families consent, and strategies. Our Informed Solutions for Better Outcomes Pilot Project Report demonstrates that when we collaborate, we can create a system that truly supports neurodivergent individuals toward better life outcomes.

AISee Collaborative and partners Autism Coordination Resouce Hub - South Lanarkshire Council and Scottish ADHD Coalition are presenting '1000 Times Better' Workshop at this years Children's and Young Peoples Centre for Justice. The title of workshop is actually a quote from the pilots by a Team Lead Youth Justice, social worker. Another quote from the project report “I wish All young people had access to this project. I feel this should be central to assessing unmet needs in school and helping schools (and parents) and social work get the resources they require.” Parent/Professional . Both of those fellow professionals are contributing to at the same conference within their own specialism. An illustration that such a proactive practice of indicative profiling, can serve multi-agency and individual and family with positive collaborative partnerships.

Summary of Indicative Profiling in the Justice System

Indicative profiling is a vital bridge between the recognition of neurodivergent traits and the implementation of effective support. By utilizing earlier indicative assessment tools, the justice system can move from a one-size-fits-all model to a personalized approach that prioritizes prevention and meaningful rehabilitation. This strategy addresses the root causes of neurodivergent involvement in the legal system, ensuring fairer treatment and better outcomes for individuals and society at large.

Core Takeaways:

Indicative profiling provides immediate, functional data that clinical diagnosis may delay.
Early identification reduces the risk of unnecessary criminalization and escalation.
Assessment tools like DAWBA empower professionals to provide targeted support.
Neuro-informed rehabilitation significantly reduces recidivism rates by addressing specific needs.
Collaboration between agencies is essential for a systemic shift toward neuro-equity.

If you are a professional in the justice, education, or social work sectors looking to implement these tools, please Contact us to learn how we can support your journey toward informed solutions. Together, we can ensure that neurodivergent individuals are seen, understood, and empowered to succeed.

Mindful Parenting and ADHD: A Resource for Inclusive Support

Fri, 12 Jun 2026 08:47:41 GMT

A wonderful supportive suggestion to AISee’s Inspirational and Reflective List.

Parent/Carer-Focused Appeal
If you are supporting a child with ADHD, this book offers practical, reassuring guidance you can use in everyday family life. Written in clear, accessible language by a paediatrician, it helps parents and carers better understand ADHD while offering proven mindfulness-based strategies to reduce stress, build connection, and create calmer routines at home. It is a thoughtful and encouraging resource for families looking for realistic support, greater confidence, and a more compassionate way to navigate daily challenges together.

Professional Endorsement for Support Staff
This is a highly valuable resource for support staff working with children and families affected by ADHD. Grounded in proven mindfulness techniques and written by a paediatrician, the book combines professional credibility with practical advice that can be applied in real-world settings. Its approachable, non-technical style makes it especially useful for staff who want to strengthen their understanding, support emotional regulation, and offer informed, compassionate guidance to both children and their carers.

One can purchase from here

Thom Kirkwood FITOL. FIntAPA. MIEP. GA.

Advocating Inclusion Specialist

AISee Collaborative Limited

Global Interlocutor

International Advocacy Practitioners Association

A Reflective View of Yosef through the Lens of Autism

Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:54:14 GMT

This book was recommended for inclusion in AISee’s inspirational and reflective reading list by an international colleague. For me, it proved to be more reflective than inspirational. It invited me to pause and think not only about how our understanding has developed over time, but also how much remains uncertain, unspoken and still to be learnt.

It first led me to reflect on how long the journey of learning, research, and understanding can be. The first recorded use of the word autism is generally attributed to the Swiss psychiatrist Paul Eugen Bleuler around 1911. It appeared again in the work of the Russian psychiatrist Grunya Sukhareva in the early 1920s, culminating in one of the first clinical descriptions of autistic traits in 1925. That was some twenty-five years before the work of Kanner and Asperger, a reminder of how gradual, layered, and often incomplete progress in this field has been.

Because my own voluntary involvement and since mid-90s family and professional, with learning disabilities and autism began in 1974, the book also prompted a more personal reflection on the importance of careful observation within holistic assessment. Attentive observation can reveal far more than areas of difficulty alone; it can also illuminate strengths, capacities, and qualities that might otherwise be missed. That fuller perspective matters deeply if we are to understand the whole person, rather than define them solely by challenge or diagnosis. I have explored this further in my blog on how to create an individualised holistic observational assessment HERE

All of this brings me back to the book itself. Many of the author’s insights seem closely bound to the long evolution of understanding around autism. What stayed with me most was the invitation to revisit a familiar story with greater patience, curiosity, and compassion.

In the book, Yosef’s behaviour, relationships, and personal development are often presented as difficult to interpret and resistant to easy explanation. The author, however, offers a thoughtful and coherent reading of the Biblical narrative, suggesting that Yosef’s character may plausibly be understood through the lens of autism. Seen in this way, he becomes less enigmatic and more recognisable: a person whose life reflects both strengths and vulnerabilities, gifts and struggles. For me, that interpretation makes the story not only more accessible, but more deeply human.

In that sense, the book offers more than an interpretation of Yosef; it opens a wider invitation to read difference with greater care, dignity, and understanding.

One can purchase from here

Thom Kirkwood PhD. FITOL. FIntAPA. MIEP. GA.

Advocating Inclusion Specialist

AISee Collaborative Limited

Global Interlocutor

International Advocacy Practitioners Association

How to Create an Individualised Holistic Observational Assessment (2026)

Sat, 30 May 2026 08:34:27 GMT

An individualised holistic observational assessment is a comprehensive, student-centered evaluation that identifies a learner's unique cognitive, sensory, emotional, and academic needs. Unlike standard tests, it looks at the whole person and their environment to create a tailored roadmap for success, ensuring neurodivergent students receive the specific support they require to thrive.

What is an individualised holistic observational assessment?

An individualised holistic assessment is a process of identifying the specific strengths, challenges, and environmental factors that influence a student's ability to learn and engage in a school setting. Instead of focusing solely on what a child cannot do, this approach looks at the why and the how . It considers the intersection of various domains: cognitive processing, sensory profiles, emotional regulation, and communication styles.

In the context of modern education, particularly within Scotland and the wider UK, the shift toward a holistic model is essential for supporting neurodivergent learners. This method moves away from a purely medical model—which often looks for a deficit to fix—and toward a social model of disability. This means we assess not just the student, but the environment around them. Does the classroom lighting cause sensory overload? Is the curriculum delivered in a way that respects their executive functioning? By asking these questions, we create a truly individualised profile.

Why does holistic assessment matter for neurodivergent learners?

For many students with ADHD, Autism, Dyslexia, or other neurodivergent traits, traditional standardised testing only captures a fraction of their potential. It often fails to account for the barriers that prevent them from demonstrating their knowledge. A holistic assessment is vital because:

It captures the 'Spiky Profile': Many neurodivergent individuals have significant strengths in some areas and challenges in others. A holistic view ensures both are recognised.
It addresses sensory needs: Sensory processing is often the foundation of learning. If a child is in 'survival mode' due to noise or light, they cannot access the curriculum.
It promotes self-advocacy: When students understand their own learning profile, they are empowered to ask for the tools they need.
It informs effective intervention: Without a holistic view, interventions are often 'trial and error'. A good assessment leads directly to solutionising with precision.
It fosters inclusion: By understanding the individual, schools can make 'reasonable adjustments' that are actually effective, rather than generic.

Key Components of an Effective Assessment Framework

To create a robust individualised holistic assessment, educators and parents must look at several key pillars. This isn't a one-off meeting but a dynamic collection of data that builds a living document. At AISee Collaborative Limited , we believe in looking at the following domains:

1. The Sensory Profile

Sensory processing is often overlooked in traditional assessments. We must ask: How does the student respond to noise, light, touch, and movement? A student who is constantly seeking movement (proprioception) might be labeled as 'disruptive' when they are actually trying to regulate their nervous system. Mapping these needs allows for an environment that supports, rather than hinders, learning.

2. Communication and Interaction

How does the student process information and express themselves? This goes beyond verbal speech. It includes understanding social nuances, processing time for instructions, and the use of alternative or augmentative communication (AAC) if necessary. Effective collaborating between the school's speech and language therapists and classroom teachers is crucial here.

3. Executive Functioning

This is the 'manager' of the brain. It involves working memory, flexible thinking, and self-control. A holistic assessment identifies where these functions might be strained. Does the student struggle with starting tasks (initiation)? Or do they have trouble switching between subjects (transition)? Identifying these specific hurdles allows for targeted support like visual timetables or task breakdowns.

4. Emotional and Social Well-being

Learning does not happen in a vacuum. A student's emotional state—their sense of belonging, anxiety levels, and self-esteem—directly impacts their academic output. We must assess the student's 'battery'—what drains them and what recharges them during the school day.

How do you gather data for a student-centered profile?

Gathering data for an individualised holistic assessment requires a 'triangulation' approach. This means collecting evidence from multiple sources to ensure the most accurate picture possible. No single person has the full story.

Observation in Context: Observe the student in various settings—during a quiet lesson, in the noisy lunchroom, and during physical education. Note the differences in their engagement and regulation.
Parental and Carer Insights: Parents are the experts on their children. They see the 'after-school restraint collapse' and the sensory triggers that might be masked in school. Their input is foundational.
The Student’s Voice: Whenever possible, the student must be involved. Use age-appropriate tools like 'One Page Profiles' or 'All About Me' booklets. Ask them: What helps you learn? What makes you feel stuck?
Work Samples and Academic Data: Review their work, looking for patterns. Do they excel in visual tasks but struggle with written ones? Does their performance fluctuate based on the time of day?
Professional Consultations: Incorporate findings from educational psychologists, occupational therapists, or specialist teachers who have worked with the student.

The Role of Collaboration in the Assessment Process

At AISee Collaborative Limited, our name reflects our core value: Collaborating . A holistic assessment is only as good as the partnership between the home and the school. When teachers, support staff, parents, and the student work together, the assessment moves from a piece of paper to a functional tool. for real practice application.

Collaboration ensures that the strategies identified in the assessment are consistent. If a student uses a specific sensory tool at home that works, it should be considered for school. If a teacher finds a way to explain math concepts that clicks, that information should be shared with the parents. This synergy creates a supportive 'wrap-around' effect for the learner. It lowers barriers and allows the student's true potential to shine through.

Implementing the Findings: From Assessment to Action

Prioritise Adjustments: Start with high-impact, low-cost changes like seating placement, visual aids, or 'movement breaks'.
Set SMART Goals: Ensure any targets set are Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound, but also rooted in the student's personal interests.
Regular Reviews: A holistic profile is not static. As the student grows and the curriculum changes, the assessment must be updated. We recommend a termly review to ensure the support remains relevant.
Staff Training: Ensure all staff members who interact with the student understand their profile. Consistency is key to a neurodivergent student's sense of safety.

Common Challenges in School-Based Assessments

Creating a truly holistic assessment is not without its hurdles. Common challenges include:

Time Constraints: Teachers are under immense pressure. Dedicating time to deep observation can be difficult.
Resource Limitations: Access to specialist professionals can be slow, leading to 'wait-and-see' approaches that delay support.
Misunderstanding Neurodivergence: If staff lack training, they may mistake sensory or neurological needs for 'behavioral issues'.
Fragmented Communication: Information can sometimes get lost between different departments or between home and school.

To overcome these, schools must adopt a culture of curiosity rather than compliance. By prioritizing the Identifying process early, schools actually save time in the long run by reducing student distress and classroom disruption.

Summary: How to master the individualised holistic assessment

Creating a high-quality individualised holistic assessment is a journey of discovery that places the student at the heart of the process. By moving beyond standard academic metrics and looking at the sensory, emotional, and cognitive landscape of the learner, educators and parents can unlock significant improvements in both well-being and achievement.

Core Takeaways for Success:

Think Holistically: Always consider the sensory and emotional environment alongside academic tasks.
Collaborate Early: Involve parents, carers, and the student from the very first step to ensure a 360-degree view.
Focus on Strengths: Use the assessment to find what works, not just what is 'broken'.
Review Regularly: Update the profile as the student evolves and transitions through school stages.
Act on Evidence: Use the findings to implement concrete, personalised adjustments that lower learning barriers.

It is worth appreciating the benefit of this form of collaboration, It helps include, support all in compliance with various pieces of legislation, for example additional support for learning, children's rights, and more.

For more information, watch out for supportive By Community for Community information leaflets, or take a look at our increasing Inspirational and Reflective Reading List, and blogs.

By following these principles, you ensure that every neurodivergent student has a roadmap tailored to their unique mind, leading to better outcomes and a more inclusive educational experience for all. If you need further guidance or wish to explore our workshops, please visit our About page to learn more about our neurodivergent-led approach.

Thom Kirkwood PhD. FITOL. FIntAPA. MIEP. GA.

Director/Advocating Inclusion Specialist

AISee Collaborative Limited

Global Interlocutor

International Advocacy Practitioners Association

Benefits of a Development and Wellbeing Assessments for individuals and professionals with the Youth Justice System (2026)

Wed, 27 May 2026 09:33:06 GMT

According to Dis Life: '85% of prison inmates are neurodivergent - but does anybody care?' - The Mirror ., m any of whom came through the youth justice system.

A development and wellbeing assessment is a comprehensive evaluation designed to identify the neurodevelopmental, cognitive, and emotional needs of a young person. Within the youth justice system, these assessments provide essential data to ensure interventions are rehabilitative, legally sound, and tailored to the individual’s unique profile. Could this be supportive of Royal College of Psychiatrists in Scotland ‘Multi-system solutions for meeting the needs of autistic people and people with ADHD in Scotland’ R.C. Psych. 2025 ?

Why is a development and wellbeing assessment crucial in youth justice?

In the complex landscape of the youth justice system, understanding the 'why' behind a young person's behavior is as important as the 'what.' Many individuals entering the justice system present with complex histories, often including undiagnosed neurodivergent conditions or trauma. Without a formal development and wellbeing assessment, these underlying factors remain invisible, leading to a cycle of misunderstanding and ineffective intervention.

By prioritizing these assessments, practitioners move away from a one-size-fits-all approach. For a social worker or a youth justice officer, the assessment acts as a roadmap. It clarifies whether a young person is failing to comply with an order because of defiance or because they lack the executive functioning skills to manage their schedule. It determines if a 'lack of remorse' in an interview is actually a symptom of a communication disorder rather than a character flaw. This shift in perspective is the foundation of Identifying the true barriers to progress.

Furthermore, these assessments are vital for preventing the 'revolving door' of the justice system. When a young person's developmental needs are met with appropriate support, the likelihood of reoffending decreases significantly. We are not just assessing for the sake of documentation; we are assessing to transform lives. The insights gained allow for the creation of robust, evidence-based management plans that address root causes rather than just symptoms, ensuring that every interaction within the justice system is an opportunity for positive change.

Understanding the link between neurodiversity and youth outcomes

Statistical data consistently indicates that neurodivergent individuals—those with ADHD, Autism, Dyslexia, or Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD)—are significantly overrepresented in the youth justice system. For many of these young people, their journey into the system began with unsupported needs in educational or social settings. When these needs are not recognized early, the individual often faces a lifetime of systemic barriers.

AISee Collaborative Limited is neurodivergent-led, meaning we understand that neurodiversity is not a deficit but a different way of processing the world. However, when the world (and specifically the justice system) is not designed for that processing style, 'friction' occurs. This friction often manifests as behavioral issues or legal trouble. A development and wellbeing assessment serves as the bridge between the individual's internal experience and the external requirements of the law.

By focusing on Educating the stakeholders involved—police, solicitors, and educators—we can begin to change the narrative. Understanding neurodiversity allows these professionals to adjust their communication styles, interrogation techniques, and sentencing recommendations. It moves the conversation from 'what is wrong with this child?' to 'what does this young person need to succeed?' This paradigm shift is essential for creating a justice system that is truly equitable and restorative.

How does an assessment improve legal outcomes for solicitors and sheriffs?

For legal professionals, evidence is the currency of the courtroom. A development and wellbeing assessment provides a high-quality, objective evidence base that can be used by solicitors to advocate more effectively for their clients. In Scotland, where the focus is increasingly on a 'whole system approach' and the 'Kilbrandon principles,' understanding the developmental maturity of a young person is legally significant.

When a solicitor presents an assessment to a sheriff or magistrate, they are providing a clear context for the individual’s actions. This information can influence:

Fitness to Plead: Determining if the young person actually understands the charges and the legal process.
Culpability: Assessing how much the young person’s neurodevelopmental profile impacted their decision-making at the time of the offense.
Sentencing Options: Steering the court toward community-based, therapeutic interventions rather than custodial sentences that might exacerbate existing issues.
Communication Adjustments: Informing the court on how to speak to the young person so they can meaningfully participate in their own defense.

By Empowering legal experts with this data, we ensure that justice is not blind to the realities of neurodevelopment. A sheriff who understands that a defendant has significant cognitive processing delays will be more likely to approve a tailored supervision order that includes specialist support, rather than a standard order that the young person is likely to breach due to their disability.

Facilitating informed solutions for social workers and educators

Social workers and educators are often the frontline of support, yet they are frequently stretched thin with generic resources. A development and wellbeing assessment provides the specific, granular detail needed for Solutionising complex cases. Instead of guessing which intervention might work, these professionals can align their strategies with the young person's actual cognitive profile.

For an educator, knowing that a student has a specific sensory processing disorder can lead to immediate, low-cost changes in the learning environment that prevent 'meltdowns' which might otherwise lead to police involvement. For a social worker, understanding a young person's attachment history in conjunction with their neurodivergence allows for a more nuanced risk assessment. It moves the practice away from reactive crisis management and toward proactive, preventative care.

Collaboration is at the heart of our mission. By Collaborating across sectors, we ensure that the findings of an assessment don't just sit in a file. We work to ensure that the educator knows what the social worker knows, and both understand the recommendations of the developmental expert. This unified approach creates a safety net of informed adults who are all pulling in the same direction, significantly improving the stability and wellbeing of the young person.

What specific areas does a comprehensive assessment cover?

To be truly effective, an assessment must look at the 'whole person.' It is not enough to simply provide a diagnosis; we must understand how different factors interact to influence the young person's daily life and legal standing. A standard high-quality development and wellbeing assessment typically includes the following domains:

Cognitive Profile: Assessing IQ, memory, and processing speed to understand learning capabilities.
Executive Functioning: Evaluating the ability to plan, organize, and control impulses.
Communication Skills: Checking both expressive and receptive language to ensure they understand legal instructions.
Emotional Regulation: Identifying how the young person manages stress, anger, and anxiety.
Neurodevelopmental History: Screening for ADHD, Autism, FASD, and other conditions that impact behavior.

These components provide a 360-degree view of the individual, ensuring no stone is left unturned in the pursuit of better outcomes.

Summary of benefits and next steps

A development and wellbeing assessment is an indispensable tool for anyone working within the youth justice system. It provides the clarity needed to navigate complex neurodevelopmental issues, ensures legal proceedings are fair and informed, and empowers practitioners to deliver truly effective support. By identifying hidden barriers and solutionising with evidence, we can significantly lower the barriers for neurodivergent individuals and foster a more just society.

Core Takeaways for Professionals:

Informed Advocacy: Solicitors can use assessments to provide crucial context in court and influence sentencing.
Targeted Support: Social workers and educators can move from generic care to specific, profile-led interventions.
Reduced Recidivism: Addressing root developmental causes leads to more sustainable long-term outcomes for young people.
Systemic Equity: Promoting a deeper understanding of neurodiversity within the legal and educational frameworks.

If you are a professional seeking to improve outcomes for a young person, consider Talking to an Advocate or exploring our Advocating services to see how a formal assessment can benefit your current case load.

One can if one wishes explore a project within our Test for Change project space.

Thom Kirkwood PhD. FITOL. FIntAPA. MIEP. GA.

Director/Advocating Inclusion Specialist

AISee Collaborative Limited

Global Interlocutor

International Advocacy Practitioners Association

Peer Advocacy - From passive recipients to trained active certificated participants

Fri, 01 May 2026 12:34:57 GMT

Peer Advocacy training empowers individuals with lived experience to support others within their community. AISee Collaborative provides Institute of Training and Occupational Learning, ITOL-accredited training programs that bridge the gap between service users' local authorities and more, ensuring informed, neurodivergent-led solutions that improve outcomes across Scotland’s service provisions and local and national policy and practice frameworks in 2026. A project in partnership with South Lanarkshire's Autism Resource Coordination Hub and MOSAIC, Members of Scotland's Autism Community.

Why is Peer Advocacy Training essential for local authorities?

Local authorities across Scotland are increasingly recognizing that traditional service models often fail to meet the nuanced needs of neurodivergent populations. Peer advocacy training provides a transformative solution by equipping individuals with the skills to navigate complex systems on behalf of their peers. This model is not just about representation; it is about systemic change. By partnering with organisations like AISee Collaborative, on projects like this, local authorities can ensure that their services are informed by actual lived experience rather than purely theoretical frameworks.

The recent success of AISee’s partnership with a local authority highlights a growing shift toward collaborative governance. When commissioners invest in peer advocacy, they are essentially investing in a more efficient, empathetic, and effective service delivery model. This approach reduces the friction often found between service providers, their professional teams and neurodivergent citizens, leading to better resource allocation via more informed and understood situations leading to higher satisfaction rates and improved outcomes.

The ITOL Accreditation: A Benchmark for Quality

One of the defining features of the peer advocacy training delivered by AISee is its accreditation by the Institute of Training and Occupational Learning (ITOL). This In the landscape of education, health and social care with advocacy, quality assurance is paramount. Accreditation ensures that the training is not only relevant but also held to a high professional standard. For commissioners across education, health and social care, and third-sector partner provision this provides the necessary confidence to invest public funds into quality training programs.

Accredited training covers essential areas including:

Ethical frameworks and boundaries in advocacy.
Effective communication strategies for diverse needs.
Navigating legal and legislative requirements in Scotland.
Conflict resolution and mediation techniques.
Empowerment-based support methodologies.

By adhering to both ITOL standards and International Advocacy Practitioners Associations, ethcis, standards and principles of posiitve advocacy, AISee ensures via their taxonomy of learning and approach, that every advocate trained through their program possesses a verified skillset that is recognized across the UK. This professionalisation of peer advocacy elevates the role from a casual support function to a critical component of the education, healthcare and social services infrastructure.

How does neurodivergent-led training improve advocacy outcomes?

AISee Collaborative is a neurodivergent-led organization, which provides a unique vantage point that traditional training providers often lack. When the training is designed and delivered by individuals who have personally navigated the barriers of neurodiversity, the curriculum becomes inherently more practical and empathetic. This "lived experience" model is central to the Advocating and Identifying phases of our work.

Neurodivergent-led training addresses specific challenges such as sensory processing, executive functioning, and communication differences that are often overlooked in standard advocacy courses. By Identifying these barriers early, advocates can create more effective Solutionising strategies that work for the individual, rather than forcing them into a one-size-fits-all box.

Key advantages of this neuro-inclusive approach include:

Increased trust between the advocate and the individual.
Reduction in "translation errors" between neurotypes.
Focus on strength-based outcomes rather than deficits.
More accurate assessment of support needs.
Enhanced long-term stability for the service user.

Building Sustainable Outcomes through Informed Solutions

The ultimate goal of any advocacy program is to achieve better outcomes. For AISee, this means lowering barriers for informed solutions. Our methodology is rooted in the belief that when people are properly Educated and Empowered , they can achieve improved autonomy and thrive. This isn't just a philosophy; it’s a measurable outcome that commissioners track to determine the success of their initiatives.

Through our peer advocacy training, we move beyond crisis management into sustainable Collaborating . We teach advocates how to help individuals build their own toolkits for success. This reduces the long-term dependency on high-cost emergency services, as individuals become better equipped to manage their own advocacy or leverage their peer networks before a situation escalates. This proactive approach is exactly what modern social care requires to remain sustainable in 2026.

We know from the International Advocacy Practitioners Association's on going work. jointly led by the membership and membership engagement committee and committee for inclusive research and reflective learning both the split of advocacy provision and the societal benefits, for example three things

peer and condition specific advocacy represent 56% and 22% respectively for advocacy provision
every 5$ spent globally on advocacy delivers a 22$ return on investment
representative of 13$ return from peer advocacy

What should commissioners look for in advocacy training?

For commissioners in local/public authorities selecting a training partner is a strategic decision. It is not enough to simply provide a course; the training must align with policy and legislative frameworks and align with broader social goals and the neurodiversity-friendly mandates growing across the UK. AISee's accredited training appreciates the policy and service impact of compliance with policy and practice frameworks. When evaluating a program, commissioners should prioritize the following factors:

Accreditation Status : Is the course recognized by a professional body like ITOL?
Lived Experience : Is the organisation led by or deeply integrated with the community it serves?
Collaborative Track Record : Does the provider have a history of working successfully with local authorities?
Actionable Frameworks : Does the training provide practical tools for Solutionising complex issues?
Long-term Support : Does the provider offer follow-up or a community of practice for advocates?

Collaborative Frameworks for Long-Term Success

Success in peer advocacy is rarely achieved in isolation. It requires a Collaborating mindset where the training provider, the local authority, and the advocates work in harmony. AISee functions as the bridge in this ecosystem.

At AISee our training doesn't just end with a certificate; it marks the beginning of a more informed way of working. By fostering these partnerships, with South Lanarkshire Autism Resource Coordination Hub and MOSAIC, we are building a network of support that spans across service provision and community, ensuring that no neurodivergent individual has to face the system alone, unless through their choice.

This collaborative approach also extends to how we design our forth coming Affordable Masterclass sessions and other ITOL, InTAPA accredited educational offerings. We believe that professional-grade training should be accessible to those who need it most, ensuring that even smaller third-sector organisations can benefit from high-level advocacy expertise.

How can you partner with AISee for advocacy training?

Partnering with AISee Collaborative is a straightforward process designed to integrate with your current service planning. Whether you are a local authority looking to pilot a new peer advocacy scheme or a third-sector organisation seeking to upskill your volunteers, we offer scalable solutions that meet ITOL/IntAPA standards and deliver real-world impact. Our team is ready to help you Talk to an Advocate or discuss a bespoke training package tailored to your specific organisational, local or regional needs.

To summarize, peer advocacy training is increasingly becoming a cornerstone of a modern, inclusive service strategy. By choosing an ITOL/IntAPA accredited, neurodivergent-led partner, you ensure that your advocacy services are both professional and profoundly impactful. We invite all commissioners and local government leads to reach out and explore how we can work together to lower barriers and create better outcomes for all.

AISee Collaborative is an Institute of Training and Occupational Learning Accredited Training Centre.

AISee Collaborative is an International Advocacy Partitioners Association Accredited Advocacy Centre.

Core Takeaways for Commissioners

Quality Guarantee : ITOL accreditation ensures high-level professional standards in advocacy.
Neuro-Inclusive Design : Neurodivergent leadership leads to more effective, practical training modules.
Systemic Efficiency : Proactive peer advocacy reduces long-term reliance on high-cost crisis services.
Scottish Context : Training is designed to meet the specific legislative and social needs of Scotland UK.
Scalable Solutions : Programs are adaptable for both large local authorities and smaller third-sector groups.
Knowledge Transfer : Participants rating of before and after training rated a knowledge transfer of 124.8%
Adversarial Reduction : Peer advocacy changes attitudes and reduces challenges

“The 10-week Peer Advocacy Training delivered by AISee was the direct result of successful collaboration between ARCH South Lanarkshire and MOSAIC, one of our home-grown constituted groups operating within the ARCH centre. Our Asset-Based Community Development model of service delivery enabled us to target community-identified priorities then set about addressing these together as equal stakeholders. By informing and empowering peer advocacy volunteers purposefully drawn from the community itself, we intend to amplify the ‘quieter voices’ of the South Lanarkshire autism community and ensure supports and services are informed by our ‘experts by experience.

By establishing this cohort of Peer Advocates, we will strive to contribute to more informed and holistic Additional Support Plans (ASP’s) within Primary and Secondary Educational settings."

Ramon Hutchingson, ARCH Coordinator, South Lanarkshire Council.

" It was a privilege to work with Autism Resource Coordination HUB in South Lanarkshire and MOSAIC in the delivery of this 10-week accredited peer advocacy training, funded by South Lanarkshire Council and MOSAIC. An important aspect to this was the connectivity to local and national policy and practice frameworks, supporting ARCH's unique structural and ethical approach to inclusion. The participants were switch on from the start and ready to expand their knowledge. As a collective we worked through numerous scenarios and build on experiences and enhanced skillsets with objectivity, empathy, reflection understanding and learning discussions.

At AISee, we have already started working on improving our learning from from this cohort to improve training programs for future learners.

I would like to acknowledge the work of all the participants and congratulate in completion and receiving of ITOL Peer Advocacy certificates.

Thom Kirkwood, Director/Advocating Inclusion Specialist, AISee Collaborative Limited

If you are ready to enhance your advocacy provision, please Contact our team today to discuss your training requirements.

CBT Toolbox for Children and Adolescents

Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:55:56 GMT

An exceptional informative resource from our Inspirational and Reflective Reading List.

This book received numerous suggestions for inclusion from frontline grass roots practitioners as well as parents and carers. As a parent carer and advocacy practitioner, I personally got intrigued.

Written by clinicians and teachers with decades of experience working with kids, these unique and effective therapy tools are vital to enhancing children and young people’s skills how to cope with and overcome their day-to-day challenges.

Step-by-step, you'll see how the best strategies from cognitive behavioural therapy are adapted for children to treat and help

Trauma
ADHD
Autism
Anxiety

Why my intrigue?

Despite over half a century of experience associated to Autism and Learning Disabilities, and parental and family experience of Autism, LD and ADHD. I am fully aware of the challenges anxiety and trauma can add to these conditions, exponentially so when an individual’s natural balance of anxiety levels increase and can spiral rapidly in the direction of major meltdown, increased blood pressure, communication and behavioural challenges, all of which add trauma or to trauma and add to the stress levels of not just the individual but those around and working with the individual.

I equally thought. Can this resource blend or fit in with AISee’s approach of CIHA, CPERG, IRL, for PCP.

Was my intrigue answered?

On a purely personal basis, I have to say yes. To start it provided an excellent introduction, including a section on how to use, with a range of activities to address countless symptoms with self-building exercises, not just beneficial for the individual, but for the professional practitioner also. This was supported by three types of worksheets, with different uses and each written from a different perspective, with 200+ worksheets and/or exercises.

Filling a gap, lending its structure and the authors experience to flexibility with a taxonomy of approach that goes beyond the page and expands beyond the activity, this book does disseminate from experience, knowledge understanding and know how adding real practical value to the ever-increasing offer available.

The big benefit for me personally and in practice within our household was the approach and flexibility that I was able to adapt with positive stepping stone outcomes.

Caveat

I am lucky, over the decades I have built up a resource that can answer or informally support any questions I may have in relation to practical implementation. I would therefore suggest if you don’t have said resource, please consider using this resource as part of a collective multidisciplinary team, or at least have access to professional guidance or support.

Curator

AISee curate this list. AISee do make recommendations or endorsements it is merely a sharing of titles as suggested by individuals, parent carers, practitioners and professionals along with summary.

Question?

Would you welcome AISee hosting a webinar with the author/s if they are willing?

#CIHA #CPERG #IRL for #PCP

Thom Kirkwood PhD. FITOL. FIntAPA. MIEP. GA.

Director AISee Collaborative.

Advocating Inclusion Specialist

Global Interlocutor International Advocacy Practitioners Association.

Do we have ‘Golden Opportunity’ reset?

Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:29:01 GMT

I hear you ask, what is he talking about this time? I had the privilege a couple of weeks ago of attending one of IntAPA’s DiACs. An IntAPA take on the work of AISee Collaborative, DiAC - Drop in Advocacy Café’s.

This was a great global discussion with fellow members. These members included advocacy practitioners and other members who have an advocating component to their main day job, teachers, allied health professionals, social workers and more.

What came to the fore very quickly was the global regression and practice of avoidance as opposed to more meaningful inclusion within education, occupational opportunities, for the communities of autism, ADHD and learning disabilities.

Personally, I admit, I was a bit taken aback by this. Especially given from Listening Globally, Thinking Nationally, Acting Locally, LGTNAL, from across 36 countries, it was collectively identified the 17 systemic challenges, a global first faced by this community, and there have been significant strides or so the rhetoric would have us believe in addressing them.

Interestingly for me, I took the opportunity, from a Scottish context, and brought up two recent pieces, excellent pieces of Scottish legislation into the discussion namely

UNCRC Incorporation (Scotland) Act 2024

This act came into force on 16 July 2024. It directly incorporates the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child into Scots Law within devolved competence. It makes it unlawful for public authorities to act incompatibly with UNCRC requirements.

Legal Enforcement: Children, young people and their representatives can take public authorities to court for violating UNCRC rights.
Public Authority Duties: Public bodies must ensure their actions comply with UNCRC.
Children’s Rights Scheme: Scottish Ministers are required to create a scheme to better effect children’s rights and report annually.
Impact Assessment: A Child Rights and Wellbeing Impact Assessment (CRWIA) must be prepared for new legislation and strategic decisions.
Commissioners Powers: The Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland have the power to take legal action in cases of right breaches.

The Act covers all aspects of children's lives, including the right to education, health, play, and protection. It ensures that children's rights are legally protected, making them directly enforceable in domestic law.

Note: many attendees of the DiAC were surprised by UNCRC Incorporation as to just parliamentary ratification. Attendees were kindly reminded of the six continental webinars I did in the autumn of 2024, on UNCRC.

Education (Scotland) Act 2025

This Act reorganises Scottish education governance, creating “Qualifications Scotland” to replace the SQA, and establishing an Independent HMCI of Education. It enhances rights by strengthening learner/stakeholder voices in reforms and focussing Education Scotland on curriculum design.

With Respect to Rights:

Enhanced Voice and Engagement: This legislation mandates that the voices of children, young people, teachers, and practitioners are heard in educational governance.
Independent Inspections: HMIE is established as a separate entity from Education Scotland to provide independent, impartial oversight.
Learner-Centred Qualifications: The new body, Qualification Scotland, is designed to be more collaborative and focused on needs of learners
Curriculum Focus: Education Scotland is refocused specifically on design, delivery and improvement to the curriculum.

Both enhanced and opened the discussion right up, I saw and heard wonderful multi-disciplinary practitioners being genuinely connected, communicating, with broad contributory respecting discussion.

One asks, why does this matter in Scotland? Scotland is not alone. Scotland like other countries now has close to half of the school’s population 43% according to recent report having an additional support need.

Conclusions

This international DiAC, went beyond, borders it enhanced knowledge and generated the following message being taken back to their colleagues and organisations and communities.

‘Excellent legislation to make inclusion meaningful and matter, and to bring an education system up to ‘fit for purpose’ for including, educating, person focussed, outcome focussed, beyond academia. An opportunity to educate children and young people for the future, their future, for their benefit, employers’ benefits and societies benefit.’

Big caveat question.

Does the Scottish Communities know this, and will there be genuine opportunity for collaboration and will the Scottish people themselves take the

Opportunity to collaborate?

This is a must for collaboration, individuals, families, employers and policy makers, at all levels, when one adds the ASN trajectory to the aging trajectory of carers now in retirement age and indeed in their 80s, even 90s. we are as a nation on an unsustainable pathway.

I cannot answer this. I do however fear like so many positives, I hear from these events, opportunities may be lost due to cronyism, nepotism, political appointeeism and tactical avoidism, all not unique to one country or another.

This was great discussional beyond borders event.

A Golden Opportunity for Scotland and beyond to capture ‘real practice application’ and ‘inclusive reflective learning.’

Thom Kirkwood PhD. FITOL. FIntAPA. MIEP. GA.

Global Interlocutor

International Advocacy Practitioners Association.

Empowering Voices, Improving Practice, Informing Choices.

March 2026